|
LIFE OF ANNE CATHERINE EMMERICH,
RELIGIOUS OF THE ORDER OF ST. AUGUSTINE, AT THE CONVENT OF AGNETENBERG, DULMEN, WESTPHALIA.
ANNE CATHERINE EMMERICH was born at Flamske, a village situated about a mile and a half from
Coesfeld, in the bishopric of Munster, on the 8th of September 1774, and was baptised in the
church of St. James at Coesfeld. Her parents, Bernard Emmerich and Anne Hiller, were poor
peasants, but distinguished for their piety and virtue.
The childhood of Anne Catherine bore a striking resemblance to that of the Venerable Anne
Garzias de St. Barthelemi, of Dominica del Paradiso, and of several other holy persons born in
the same rank of life as herself. Her angel-guardian used to appear to her as a child; and when
she was taking care of sheep in the fields, the Good Shepherd himself, under the form of a young
shepherd, would frequently come to her assistance. From childhood she was accustomed to have
divine knowledge imparted to her in visions of all kinds, and was often favoured by visits from
the Mother of God and Queen of Heaven, who, under the form of a sweet, lovely, and majestic
lady, would bring the Divine Child to be, as it were, her companion, and would assure her that
she loved and would ever protect her. Many of the saints would also appear to her, and receive
from her hands the garlands of flowers which she had prepared in honour of their festivals. All
these favours and visions surprised the child less than if an
earthly princess and the lords and ladies of her court had come to visit her. Nor was she, later
in life, more surprised at these celestial visits, for her innocence caused her to feel far more
at her ease with our Divine Lord, his Blessed Mother and the Saints, than she could ever be with
even the most kind and amiable of her earthly companions. The names of Father, Mother, Brother,
and Spouse, appeared to her expressive of the real connections subsisting between God and man,
since the Eternal Word had been pleased to be born of a woman, and so to become our Brother, and
these sacred titles were not mere words in her mouth.
While yet a child, she used to speak with innocent candour and simplicity of all that she saw,
and her listeners would be filled with admiration at the histories she would relate from Holy
Writ; but their questions and remarks having sometimes disturbed her peace of mind, she
determined to keep silence on such subjects for the future. In her innocence of heart, she
thought that it was not right to talk of things of this sort, that other persons never did so,
and that her speech should be only Yea, yea, and Nay,
nay, or Praise be to Jesus Christ. The visions with which she was
favoured were so like realities, and appeared to her so sweet and delightful, that she supposed
all Christian children were favoured with the same; and she concluded that those who never
talked on such subjects were only more discreet and modest than herself, so she resolved to keep
silence also, to be like them.
Almost from her cradle she possessed the gift of distinguishing what was good or evil, holy or
profane, blessed or accursed, in material as well as in spiritual things, thus resembling St.
Sibyllina of Pavia, Ida of Louvain, Ursula Benincasa, and some other holy souls. In her earliest
childhood she used to bring out of the fields useful herbs, which no one had ever before
discovered to be good for anything, and plant them near her father’s cottage, or in some spot
where she was accustomed to work and play; while on the other hand she would root up all
poisonous plants, and particularly those ever used for superstitious practices or in dealings with the devil. Were she by chance in a place where some great crime
had been committed, she would hastily run away, or begin to pray and do penance. She used also
to perceive by intuition when she was in a consecrated spot, return thanks to God, and be filled
with a sweet feeling of peace. When a priest passed by with the Blessed Sacrament, even at a
great distance from her home or from the place where she was taking care of her flock, she would
feel a strong attraction in the direction whence he was coming, run to meet him, and be kneeling
in the road, adoring the Blessed Sacrament, long before he could reach the spot.
She knew when any object was consecrated, and experienced a feeling of disgust and repugnance
when in the neighbourhood of old pagan cemeteries, whereas she was attracted to the sacred
remains of the saints as steel by the magnet. When relics were shown to her, she knew what
saints they had belonged to, and could give not only accounts of the minutest and hitherto
unknown particulars of their lives, but also histories of the relics themselves, and of the
places where they had been preserved. During her whole life she had continual intercourse with
the souls in purgatory; and all her actions and prayers were offered for the relief of their
sufferings. She was frequently called upon to assist them, and even reminded in some miraculous
manner, if she chanced to forget them. Often, while yet very young, she used to be awakened out
of her sleep by bands of suffering souls, and to follow them on cold winter’s nights with bare
feet, the whole length of the Way of the Cross to Coesfeld, though the ground was covered with
snow.
From her infancy to the day of her death she was indefatigable in relieving the sick, and in
dressing and curing wounds and ulcers, and she was accustomed to give to the poor every farthing
she possessed. So tender was her conscience, that the slightest sin she fell into caused her
such pain as to make her ill, and absolution then always restored her immediately to health.
The extraordinary nature of the favours bestowed on her by
Almighty God was no hindrance in the way of her devoting herself to hard labour, like any other
peasant-girl; and we may also be allowed to observe that a certain degree of the spirit of
prophecy is not unusually to be found among her country men and women. She was taught in the
school of suffering and mortification, and there learned lessons of perfection. She allowed
herself no more sleep or food than was absolutely necessary; passed whole hours in prayer every
night; and in winter often knelt out of doors on the snow. She slept on the ground on planks
arranged in the form of a cross. Her food and drink consisted of what was rejected by others;
she always kept the best parts even of that for the poor and sick, and when she did not know of
any one to give them to, she offered them to God in a spirit of child-like faith, begging him to
give them to some person who was more in need than herself. When there was anything to be seen
or heard which had no reference to God or religion, she found some excuse for avoiding the spot
to which others were hastening, or, if there, closed her eyes and ears. She was accustomed to
say that useless actions were sinful, and that when we denied our bodily senses any
gratification of this kind, we were amply repaid by the progress which we made in the interior
life, in the same manner as pruning renders vines and other fruit-trees more productive. From
her early youth, and wherever she went, she had frequent symbolical visions, which showed her in
parables, as it were, the object of her existence, the means of attaining it, and her future
sufferings, together with the dangers and conflicts which she would have to go through.
She was in her sixteenth year, when one day, whilst at work in the fields with her parents and
sisters, she heard the bell ringing at the Convent of the Sisters of the Annunciation, at
Coesfeld. This sound so inflamed her secret desire to become a nun, and had so great an effect
upon her, that she fainted away, and remained ill and weak for a long time after. When in her
eighteenth year she was apprenticed at Coesfeld to a dressmaker, with whom she passed two years,
and then returned to her parents. She asked to be received at the
Convents of the Augustinians at Borken, of the Trappists at Darfeld, and of the Poor Clares at
Munster; but her poverty, and that of these convents, always presented an insuperable obstacle
to her being received. At the age of twenty, having saved twenty thalers (about 3l. English), which she had earned by her sewing, she went with this little
sum—a perfect fortune for a poor peasant-girl—to a pious organist of Coesfeld, whose daughter
she had known when she first lived in the town. Her hope was that, by learning to play on the
organ; she might succeed in obtaining admittance into a convent. But her irresistible desire to
serve the poor and give them everything she possessed left her no time to learn music, and
before long she had so completely stripped herself of everything, that her good mother was
obliged to bring her bread, milk, and eggs, for her own wants and those of the poor, with whom
she shared everything. Then her mother said: ‘Your desire to leave your father and myself, and
enter a convent, gives us much pain; but you are still my beloved child, and when I look at your
vacant seat at home, and reflect that you have given away all your savings, so as to be now in
want, my heart is filled with sorrow, and I have now brought you enough to keep you for some
time.’ Anne Catherine replied: ‘Yes, dear mother, it is true that I have nothing at all left,
because it was the holy will of God that others should be assisted by me; and since I have given
all to him, he will now take care of me, and bestow his divine assistance upon us all.’ She
remained some years at Coesfeld, employed in labour, good works, and prayer, being always guided
by the same inward inspirations. She was docile and submissive as a child in the hands of her
guardian-angel.
Although in this brief sketch of her life we are obliged to omit many interesting
circumstances, there is one which we must not pass over in silence. When about twenty-four years
of age, she received a favour from our Lord, which has been granted to many persons devoted in
an especial manner to meditation on his painful Passion; namely, to experience the actual and
visible sufferings of his sacred Head, when crowned with thorns.
The following is the account she herself has given of the circumstances under which so
mysterious a favour was bestowed upon her: ‘About four years previous to my admittance into the
convent, consequently in 1798, it happened that I was in the Jesuits’ Church at Coesfeld, at
about twelve o’clock in the day, kneeling before a crucifix and absorbed in meditation, when all
on a sudden I felt a strong but pleasant heat in my head, and I saw my Divine Spouse, under the
form of a young man clothed with light, come towards me from the altar, where the Blessed
Sacrament was preserved in the tabernacle. In his left hand he held a crown of flowers, in his
right hand a crown of thorns, and he bade me choose which I would have. I chose the crown of
thorns; he placed it on my head, and I pressed it down with both hands. Then he disappeared, and
I returned to myself, feeling, however, violent pain around my head. I was obliged to leave the
church, which was going to be closed. One of my companions was kneeling by my side, and as I
thought she might have seen what happened to me, I asked her when we got home whether there was
not a wound on my forehead, and spoke to her in general terms of my vision, and of the violent
pain which had followed it. She could see nothing outwardly, but was not astonished at what I
told her, because she knew that I was sometimes in an extraordinary state, without her being
able to understand the cause. The next day my forehead and temples were very much swelled, and I
suffered terribly. This pain and swelling often returned, and sometimes lasted whole days and
nights. I did not remark that there was blood on my head until my companions told me I had
better put on a clean cap, because mine was covered with red spots. I let them think whatever
they liked about it, only taking care to arrange my head-dress so as to hide the blood which
flowed from my head, and I continued to observe the same precaution even after I entered the
convent, where only one person perceived the blood, and she never betrayed my secret.’
Several other contemplative persons, especially devoted to the
passion of our Lord, have been admitted to the privilege of suffering the torture inflicted by
the crown of thorns, after having seen a vision in which the two crowns were offered them to
choose between, for instance, among others, St. Catherine of Sienna, and Pasithea of Crogis, a
Poor Clare of the same town, who died in 1617.
The writer of these pages may here be allowed to remark that he himself has, in full daylight,
several times seen blood flow down the forehead and face, and even beyond the linen wrapped
round the neck of Anne Catherine. Her desire to embrace a religious life was at length
gratified. The parents of a young person whom the Augustinian nuns of Dulmen wished to receive
into their order, declared that they would not give their consent except on condition that Anne
Catherine was taken at the same time. The nuns yielded their assent, though somewhat
reluctantly, on account of their extreme poverty; and on the 13th November 1802, one week before
the feast of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin, Anne Catherine entered on her novitiate. At
the present day vocations are not so severely tested as formerly; but in her case, Providence
imposed special trials, for which, rigorous as they were, she felt she never could be too
grateful. Sufferings or privations, which a soul, either alone or in union with others, imposes
upon herself, for God’s greater glory, are easy to bear; but there is one cross more nearly
resembling the cross of Christ than any other, and that is, lovingly and patiently to submit to
unjust punishments, rebuffs, or accusations. It was the will of God that during her year’s
novitiate she should, independently of the will of any creature, be tried as severely as the
most strict mistress of novices could have clone before any mitigations had been allowed in the
rules. She learned to regard her companions as instruments in the hands of God for her
sanctification; and at a later period of her life many other things appeared to her in the same
light. But as it was necessary that her fervent soul should be constantly tried in the school of
the Cross, God was pleased that she should remain in it all her life.
In many ways her position in the convent was excessively painful. Not one of her companions,
nor even any-priest or doctor, could understand her case. She had learned, when living among
poor peasants, to hide the wonderful gifts which God had bestowed on her; but the case was
altered now that she was in familiar intercourse with a large number of nuns, who, though
certainly good and pious, were filled with ever-increasing feelings of curiosity, and even of
spiritual jealousy in her regard. Then, the contracted ideas of the community, and the complete
ignorance of the nuns concerning all those exterior phenomena by which the interior life
manifests itself, gave her much to endure, the more so, as these phenomena displayed themselves
in the most unusual and astonishing manner. She heard everything that was said against her, even
when the speakers were at one end of the convent and she at the other, and her heart was most
deeply wounded as if by poisoned arrows. Yet she bore all patiently and lovingly without showing
that she knew what was said of her. More than once charity impelled her to cast herself at the
feet of some nun who was particularly prejudiced against her, and ask her pardon with tears.
Then, she was suspected of listening at the doors, for the private feelings of dislike
entertained against her became known, no one knew how, and the nuns felt uncomfortable and
uneasy, in spite of themselves, when in her company.
Whenever the rule (the minutest point of which was Sacred in her eyes) was neglected in the
slightest degree, she beheld in spirit each infringement, and at times was inspired to fly to
the spot where the rule was being broken by some infringement of the vow of poverty, or
disregard of the hours of silence, and she would then repeat suitable passages from the rule,
without having ever learned them. She thus became an object of aversion to all those religious
who broke the rule; and her sudden appearances among them had almost the effect of apparitions.
God had bestowed upon her the gift of tears to so great an extent, that she often passed whole
hours in the church weeping over the sins and ingratitude of men,
the sufferings of the Church, the imperfections of the community, and her own faults. But these
tears of sublime sorrow could be understood by none but God, before whom she shed them, and men
attributed them to mere caprice, a spirit of discontent, or some other similar cause. Her
confessor had enjoined that she should receive the holy communion more frequently than the other
nuns, because, so ardently did she hunger after the bread of angels, that she had been more than
once near dying. These heavenly sentiments awakened feelings of jealousy in her sisters, who
sometimes even accused her of hypocrisy.
The favour which had been shown her in her admittance into the convent, in spite of her
poverty, was also made a subject of reproach. The thought of being thus an occasion of sin to
others was most painful to her, and she continually besought God to permit her to bear herself
the penalty of this want of charity in her regard. About Christmas, of the year 1802, she had a
very severe illness, which began by a violent pain about her heart.
This pain did not leave her even when she was cured, and she bore it in silence until the year
1812, when the mark of a cross was imprinted exteriorly in the same place, as we shall relate
further on. Her weakness and delicate health caused her to be looked upon more as burdensome,
than useful to the community; and this, of course, told against her in all ways, yet she was
never weary of working and serving the others, nor was she ever so happy as at this period of
her life—spent in privations and sufferings of every description.
On the 13th of November 1803, at the age of twenty-nine, she pronounced her solemn vows, and
became the spouse of Jesus Christ, in the Convent of Agnetenberg, at Dulmen. ‘When I had
pronounced my vows,’ she says, ‘my relations were again extremely kind to me. My father and my
eldest brother brought me two pieces of cloth. My father, a good, but stem man, and who had been
much averse to my entering the convent, had told me, when we parted, that he would willingly pay
for my burial, but that he would give nothing for the convent, and
he kept his word, for this piece of cloth was the winding-sheet used for my spiritual burial in
the convent.’
‘I was not thinking of myself,’ she says again, ‘I was thinking of nothing but our Lord and my
holy vows. My companions could not understand me; nor could I explain my state to them. God
concealed from them many of the favours which he bestowed upon me, otherwise they would have had
very false ideas concerning me. Notwithstanding all my trials and sufferings, I was never more
rich interiorly, and my soul was perfectly flooded with happiness. My cell only contained one
chair without a seat, and another without a back; yet in my eyes, it was magnificently
furnished, and when there I often thought myself in Heaven. Frequently during the night,
impelled by love and by the mercy of God, I poured forth the feelings of my soul by conversing
with him in loving and familiar language, as I had always done from my childhood, and then those
who were watching me would accuse me of irreverence and disrespect towards God. Once, I happened
to say that it appeared to me that I should be guilty of greater disrespect did I receive the
Body of our Lord without having conversed familiarly with him, and I was severely reprimanded.
Amid all these trials, I yet lived in peace with God and with all his creatures. When I was
working in the garden, the birds would come and rest on my head and shoulders, and we would
together sing the praises of God. I always beheld my angel-guardian at my side, and although the
devil used frequently to assault and terrify me in various ways, he was never permitted to do me
much harm. ‘My desire for the Blessed Sacrament was so irresistible, that often at night I left
my cell and went to the church, if it was open; but if not, I remained at the door or by the
walls, even in winter, kneeling or prostrate, with my arms extended in ecstasy. The convent
chaplain, who was so charitable as to come early to give me the Holy Communion, used to find me
in this state, but as soon as he was come and had opened, the church, I always recovered, and
hastened to the holy table, there to receive my Lord and my God.
When I was sacristan, I used all on a sudden to feel myself ravished in spirit, and ascend to
the highest parts of the church, on to cornices, projecting parts of the building, and
mouldings, where it seemed impossible for any being to get by human means. Then I cleaned and
arranged everything, and it appeared to me that I was surrounded by blessed spirits, who
transported me about and held me up in their hands. Their presence did not cause me the least
uneasiness, for I had been accustomed to it from my childhood, and I used to have the most sweet
and familiar intercourse with them. It was only when I was in the company of certain men that I
was really alone; and so great was then my feeling of loneliness that I could not help crying
like a child that has strayed from home.’
We now proceed to her illnesses, omitting any description of some other remarkable phenomena
of her ecstatic life, only recommending the reader to compare the accounts we have already given
with what is related of St. Mary Magdalen of Pazzi.
Anne Catherine had always been weak and delicate, and yet had been, from her earliest
childhood, in the habit of practising many mortifications, of fasting and of passing the night
in watching and prayer in the open air. She had been accustomed to continual hard labour in the
fields, at all seasons of the year, and her strength was also necessarily much tried by the
exhausting and supernatural states through which she so frequently passed. At the convent she
continued to work in the garden and in the house, whilst her spiritual labours and sufferings
were ever an the increase, so that it is by no means surprising that she was frequently ill; but
her illnesses arose from yet another cause. We have learned, from careful observations made
every day for the space of four years, and also from what she herself was unwillingly forced to
admit, that during the whole course of her life, and especially during that part of it which she
spent at the convent, when she enjoyed the highest spiritual favours, a great portion of her
illnesses and sufferings came from taking upon herself the sufferings of others. Sometimes she asked for the illness of a person who did not bear it
patiently, and relieved him of the whole or of a part of his sufferings, by taking them upon
herself; sometimes, wishing to expiate a sin or put an end to some suffering, she gave herself
up into the hands of God, and be, accepting her sacrifice, permitted her thus, in union with the
merits of his passion, to expiate the sin by suffering some illness corresponding to it. She had
consequently to bear, not only her own maladies, but those also of others—to suffer in expiation
of the sins of her brethren, and of the faults and negligences of certain portions of the
Christian community—and, finally, to endure many and various sufferings in satisfaction for the
souls of purgatory. All these sufferings appeared like real illnesses, which took the most
opposite and variable forms, and she was placed entirely under the care of the doctor, who
endeavoured by earthly remedies to cure illnesses which in reality were the very sources of her
life. She said on this subject—‘Repose in suffering has always appeared to me the most desirable
condition possible. The angels themselves would envy us, were envy not an imperfection. But for
sufferings to be really meritorious we must patiently and gratefully accept unsuitable remedies
and comforts, and all other additional trials. I did not myself fully understand my state, nor
know what it was to lead to. In my soul I accepted my different sufferings, but in my body it
was my duty to strive against them. I had given myself wholly and entirely to my Heavenly
Spouse, and his holy will was being accomplished in me; but I was living on earth, where I was
not to rebel against earthly wisdom and earthly prescriptions. Even had I fully comprehended my
state, and had both time and power to explain it, there was no one near who would have been able
to understand me. A doctor would simply have concluded that I was entirely mad, and would have
increased his expensive and painful remedies tenfold. I have suffered much in this way during
the whole of my life, and particularly when I was at the convent, from having unsuitable
remedies administered to me. Often, when my doctors and nurses had
reduced me to the last agony, and that I was near death, God took pity on me, and sent me some
supernatural assistance, which effected an entire cure.’
Four years before the suppression of her convent she went to Flamske for two days to visit her
parents. Whilst there she went once to kneel and pray for some hours before the miraculous Cross
of the Church of St. Lambert, at Coesfeld. She besought the Almighty to bestow the gifts of
peace and unity upon her convent, offered him the Passion of Jesus Christ for that intention,
and implored him to allow her to feel a portion of the sufferings which were endured by her
Divine Spouse on the Cross. From the time that she made this prayer her hands and feet became
burning and painful, and she suffered constantly from fever, which she believed was the cause of
the pain in her hands and feet, for she did not dare to think that her prayer had been granted.
Often she was unable to walk, and the pain in her hands prevented her from working as usual in
the garden. On the 3d December 1811, the convent was suppressed,5 and the church closed. The nuns
dispersed in all directions, but Anne Catherine remained, poor and ill. A kindhearted servant
belonging to the monastery attended upon her out of charity, and an aged emigrant priest, who
said Mass in the convent, remained also with her. These three individuals, being the poorest of
the Community, did not leave the convent until the spring of 1812. She was still very unwell,
and could not be moved without great difficulty. The priest lodged with a poor widow who lived
in the neighbourhood, and Anne Catherine had in the same house a wretched little room on the
ground-floor, which looked on the street. There she lived, in poverty and sickness, until the
autumn of 1813. Her ecstasies in prayer, and her spiritual intercourse with the invisible world,
became more and more frequent. She was about to be called to a state with which she was herself
but imperfectly acquainted, and in order to enter which she did
nothing but submissively abandon herself to the will of God. Our Lord was pleased about this
time to imprint upon her virginal body the stigmas of his cross and of his crucifixion, which
were to the Jews a stumbling-block, and to the Gentiles folly, and to many persons who call
themselves Christians, both the one and the other. From her very earliest childhood she had
besought our Lord to impress the marks of his cross deeply upon her heart, that so she might
never forget his infinite love for men; but she had never thought of receiving any outward
marks. Rejected by the world, she prayed more fervently than ever for this end. On the 28th of
August, the feast of St. Augustine, the patron of her order, as she was making this prayer in
bed, ravished in ecstasy and her arms stretched forth, she beheld a young man approach her
surrounded with light. It was under this form that her Divine Spouse usually appeared to her,
and he now made upon her body with his right hand the mark of a common cross. From this time
there was a mark like a cross upon her bosom, consisting of two bands crossed, about three
inches, long and one wide. Later the skin often rose in blisters on this place, as if from a
burn, and when these blisters burst a burning colourless liquid issued from them, sometimes in
such quantities as to soak through several sheets. She was long without perceiving what the case
really was, and only thought that she was in a strong perspiration. The particular meaning of
this mark has never been known.
Some weeks later, when making the same prayer, she fell into an ecstasy, and beheld the same
apparition, which presented her with a little cross of the shape described in her accounts of
the Passion. She eagerly received and fervently pressed it to her bosom, and then returned it.
She said that this cross was as soft and white as wax, but she was not at first aware that it
had made an external mark upon her bosom. A short time after, having gone with her landlady’s
little girl to visit an old hermitage near Dulmen, she all on a sudden fell into an ecstasy,
fainted away, and on her recovery was taken home by a poor peasant woman. The sharp pain which she felt in her chest continued to increase, and she saw that
there was what looked like a cross, about three inches in length, pressed tightly upon her
breast-bone, and looking red through the skin. As she had spoken about her vision to a nun with
whom she was intimate, her extraordinary state began to be a good deal talked of. On All Souls’
day, 1812, she went out for the last time, and with much difficulty succeeded in reaching the
church. From that time till the end of the year she seemed to be dying, and received the last
Sacraments. At Christmas a smaller cross appeared on the top of that upon her chest. It was the
same shape as the larger one, so that the two together formed a double forked cross. Blood
flowed from this cross every Wednesday, so as to leave the impression of its shape on paper laid
over it. After a time this happened on Fridays instead. In 1814 this flow of blood took place
less frequently, but the cross became as red as fire every Friday. At a later period of her life
more blood flowed from this cross, especially every Good Friday; but no attention was paid to
it. On the 30th March 1821, the writer of these pages saw this cross of a deep red colour, and
bleeding all over. In its usual state it was colourless, and its position only marked by slight
cracks in the skin. . . . Other Ecstaticas have received similar marks of the Cross; among
others, Catherine of Raconis, Marina de l’Escobar, Emilia Bichieri, S. Juliani Falconieri,
&c.
She received the stigmas on the last days of the year 1812. On the 29th December, about three
o’clock in the afternoon, she was lying on her bed in her little room, extremely ill, but in a
state of ecstasy and with her arms extended, meditating on the sufferings of her Lord, and
beseeching him to allow her to suffer with him. She said five Our Fathers in honour of the Five
Wounds, and felt her whole heart burning with love. She then saw a light descending towards her,
and distinguished in the midst of it the resplendent form of her crucified Saviour, whose wounds
shone like so many furnaces of light. Her heart was overflowing with joy and sorrow, and, at the
sight of the sacred wounds, her desire to suffer with her Lord
became intensely violent. Then triple rays, pointed like arrows, of the colour of blood, darted
forth from the hands, feet, and side of the sacred apparition, and struck her hands, feet, and
right side. The triple rays from the side formed a point like the head of a lance. The moment
these rays touched her, drops of blood flowed from the wounds which they made. Long did she
remain in a state of insensibility, and when she recovered her senses she did not know who had
lowered her outstretched arms. It was with astonishment that she beheld blood flowing from the
palms of her hands, and felt violent pain in her feet and side. It happened that her landlady’s
little daughter came into her room, saw her hands bleeding, and ran to tell her mother, who with
great anxiety asked Anne Catherine what had happened, but was begged by her not to speak about
it. She felt, after having received the stigmas, that an entire change had taken place in her
body; for the course of her blood seemed to have changed, and to flow rapidly towards the
stigmas. She herself used to say: ‘No words can describe in what manner it flows.’
We are indebted to a curious incident for our knowledge of the circumstances which we have
here related. On the 15th December 1819, she had a detailed vision of all that had happened to
herself, but so that she thought it concerned some other nun who she imagined must be living not
far off, and who she supposed had experienced the same things as herself. She related all these
details with a very strong feeling of compassion, humbling herself, without knowing it, before
her own patience and sufferings. It was most touching to hear her say: ‘I ought never to
complain any more, now that I have seen the sufferings of that poor nun; her heart is surrounded
with a crown of thorns, but she bears it placidly and with a smiling countenance. It is shameful
indeed for me to complain, for she has a far heavier burden to bear than I have.’
These visions, which she afterwards recognised to be her own history, were several times
repeated, and it is from them that the circumstances under which she received the stigmas became known. Otherwise she would not have related so many
particulars about what her humility never permitted her to speak of, and concerning which, when
asked by her spiritual superiors whence her wounds proceeded, the utmost she said was: ‘I hope
that they come from the hand of God.’
The limits of this work preclude us from entering upon the subject of stigmas in general, but
we may observe that the Catholic Church has produced a certain number of persons, St. Francis of
Assissium being the first, who have attained to that degree of contemplative love of Jesus which
is the most sublime effect of union with his sufferings, and is designated by theologians,
Vulnus divinum, Plago amoris viva
. There are known to have been at least fifty. Veronica Giuliani, a Capuchiness, who died
at Città di Castello in 1727, is the last individual of the class who has been canonised (on the
26th May 1831). Her biography, published at Cologne in 1810, gives a description of the state of
persons with stigmas, which in many ways is applicable to Anne Catherine. Colomba Schanolt, who
died at Bamberg in 1787, Magdalen Lorger, who died at Hadamar in 1806, both Dominicanesses, and
Rose Serra, a Capuchiness at Ozieri in Sardinia, who received the stigmas in 1801, are those of
our own times of whom we know the most. Josephine Kumi, of the Convent of Wesen, near Lake
Wallenstadt in Switzerland, who was still living in 1815, also belonged to this class of
persons, but we are not entirely certain whether she had the stigmas.
Anne Catherine being, as we have said, no longer able to walk or rise from her bed, soon
became unable also to eat. Before long she could take nothing but a little wine and water, and
finally only pure water; sometimes, but very rarely, she managed to swallow the juice of a
cherry or a plum, but she immediately vomited any solid food, taken in ever so small a quantity.
This inability to take food, or rather this faculty of living for a great length of time upon
nothing but water, we are assured by learned doctors is not quite unexampled in the history of
the sick.
Theologians will be perfectly aware that there are many instances of contemplative ascetics,
and particularly of persons frequently in a state of ecstasy and who have received the stigmas,
remaining long without taking any other food than the Blessed Sacrament; for instance, B.
Nicholas of Flue, St. Liduvina of Schiedam, St. Catherine of Sienna, St. Angela of Foligno, and
St. Louise de l’Ascension. All the phenomena exhibited in the person of Anne Catherine remained
concealed even from those who had the most intercourse with her, until the 25th February 1813,
when they were discovered accidentally by one of her old convent companions. By the end of
March, the whole town talked of them. On the 23d of March, the physician of the neighbourhood
forced her to undergo an examination. Contrary to his expectation, he was convinced of the
truth, drew up an official report of what be had seen, became her doctor and her friend, and
remained such to her death. On the 28th of March, commissioners were appointed to examine into
her case by the spiritual authorities of Munster. The consequence of this was that Anne
Catherine was henceforth looked upon kindly by her superiors, and acquired the friendship of the
late Dean Overberg, who from that time paid her every year a visit of several days’ duration,
and was her consoler and spiritual director. The medical counsellor from Druffel, who was
present at this examination in the capacity of doctor, never ceased to venerate her. In 1814, he
published in the Medical Journal of Salzbourg a detailed account of the phenomena which he had
remarked in the person of Anne Catherine, and to this we refer those of our readers who desire
more particulars upon the subject. On the 4th of April, M. Gamier, the Commissary-General of the
French police, came from Munster to see her; he inquired minutely into her case, and having
learned that she neither prophesied nor spoke on politics, declared that there was no occasion
for the police to occupy themselves about her. In 1826, he still spoke of her at Paris with
respect and emotion.
On the 22d of July 1813, Overberg came to see her, with Count de
Stolberg and his family. They remained two days with her, and Stolberg, in a letter which has
been several times printed, bore witness to the reality of the phenomena observed in Anne
Catherine, and gave expression to his intense veneration for her. He remained her friend as long
as he lived, and the members of his family never ceased recommending themselves to her prayers.
On the 29th of September 1813, Overberg took the daughter of the Princess Galitzin (who died in
1806) to visit her, and they saw with their own eyes blood flow copiously from her stigmas. This
distinguished lady repeated her visit, and, after becoming Princess of Salm, never varied in her
sentiments, but, together with her family, remained in constant communion of prayer with Anne
Catherine. Many other persons in all ranks of life were, in like manner, consoled and edified by
visiting her bed of suffering. On the 23d of October 1813, she was carried to another lodging,
the window of which looked out upon a garden. The condition of the saintly nun became day by day
more painful. Her stigmas were a source of indescribable suffering to her, down to the moment of
her death. Instead of allowing her thoughts to dwell upon those graces to the interior presence
of which they bore such miraculous outward testimony, she learned from them lessons of humility,
by considering them as a heavy cross laid upon her for her sins. Her suffering body itself was
to preach Jesus crucified. It was difficult indeed to be an enigma to all persons, an object of
suspicion to the greatest number, and of respect mingled with fear to some few, without yielding
to sentiments of impatience, irritability, or pride. Willingly would she have lived in entire
seclusion from the world, but obedience soon compelled her to allow herself to be examined and
to have judgment passed upon her by a vast number of curious persons. Suffering, as she was, the
most excruciating pains, she was not even allowed to be her own mistress, but was regarded as
something which every one fancied he had a right to look at and to pass judgment upon,—often
with no good results to any one, but greatly to the prejudice of her soul and body, because she was thus deprived of so much rest and recollection of spirit.
There seemed to be no bounds to what was expected of her, and one fat man, who had some
difficulty in ascending her narrow winding staircase, was heard to complain that a person like
Anne Catherine, who ought to be exposed on the public road, where every one could see her,
should remain in a lodging so difficult to reach. In former ages, persons in her state underwent
in private the examination of the spiritual authorities, and carried out their painful vocation
beneath the protecting shadow of hallowed walls; but our suffering heroine had been cast forth
from the cloister into the world at a time when pride, coldness of heart, and incredulity were
all the vogue; marked with the stigmas of the Passion of Christ, she was forced to wear her
bloody robe in public, under the eyes of men who scarce believed in the Wounds of Christ, far
less in those which were but their images.
Thus this holy woman, who in her youth had been in the habit of praying for long hours before
pictures of all the stages of Christ’s painful Passion, or before wayside crosses, was herself
made like unto a cross on the public road, insulted by one passer by, bathed in warm tears of
repentance by a second, regarded as a mere physical curiosity by a third, and venerated by a
fourth, whose innocent hands would bring flowers to lay at her feet.
In 1817 her aged mother came from the country to die by her side. Anne Catherine showed her
all the love she could by comforting and praying for her, and closing her eyes with her own
hands—those hands marked with the stigmas on the 13th of March of the same year. The inheritance
left to Anne Catherine by her mother was more than sufficient for one so imbued with the spirit
of mortification and suffering; and in her turn she left it unimpaired to her friends. It
consisted of these three sayings:—‘Lord, thy will, not mine, be done;’ ‘Lord, give me patience,
and then strike hard;’ ‘Those things which are not good to put in the pot are at least good to
put beneath it.’ The meaning of this last proverb was: If things are not fit to be eaten, they
may at least be burned, in order that food may be cooked; this
suffering does not nourish my heart, but by bearing it patiently, I may at least increase the
fire of divine love, by which alone life can profit us anything. She often repeated these
proverbs, and then thought of her mother with gratitude. Her father had died some little time
before.
The writer of these pages became acquainted with her state first through reading a copy of
that letter of Stolberg, to which we have already alluded, and afterwards through conversation
with a friend who had passed several weeks with her. In September 1818 he was invited by Bishop
Sailer to meet him at the Count de Stolberg’s, in Westphalia; and he went in the first place to
Sondermuhlen to see the count, who introduced him to Overberg, from whom he received a letter
addressed to Anne Catherine’s doctor. He paid her his first visit on the 1711 of September 1818;
and she allowed him to pass several hours by her side each day, until the arrival of Sailer.
From the very beginning, she gave him her confidence to a remarkable extent, and this in the
most touching and ingenuous manner. No doubt she was conscious that by relating without reserve
the history of all the trials, joys, and sorrows of her whole life, she was bestowing a most
precious spiritual alms upon him. She treated him with the most generous hospitality, and had no
hesitation in doing so, because he did not oppress her and alarm her humility by excessive
admiration. She laid open her interior to him in the same charitable spirit as a pious solitary
would in the morning offer the flowers and fruit which had grown in his garden during the night
to some way-worn traveller, who, having lost his road in the desert of the world, finds him
sitting near his hermitage. Wholly devoted to her God, she spoke in this open manner as a child
would have done, unsuspectingly, with no feelings of mistrust, and with no selfish end in view.
May God reward her!
Her friend daily wrote down all the observations that he made concerning her, and all that she
told him about her life, whether interior or exterior. Her words were characterised alternately by the most childlike simplicity and the most astonishing
depth of thought, and they fore. shadowed, as it were, the vast and sublime spectacle which
later was unfolded, when it became evident that the past, the present, and the future, together
with all that pertained to the sanctification, profanation, and judgment of souls, formed before
and within her an allegorical and historical drama, for which the different events of the
ecclesiastical year furnished subjects, and which it divided into scenes, so closely linked
together were all the prayers and sufferings which she offered in sacrifice for the Church
militant.
On the 22d of October 1818 Sailer came to see her, and having remarked that she was lodging at
the back of a public-house, and that men were playing at nine-pins under her window, said in the
playful yet thoughtful manner which was peculiar to him: ‘See, see; all things are as they
should be—the invalid nun, the spouse of our Lord, is lodging in a public-house above the ground
where men are playing at nine-pins, like the soul of man in his body.’ His interview with Anne
Catherine was most affecting; it was indeed beautiful to behold these two souls, who were both
on fire with the love of Jesus, and conducted by grace through such different paths, meet thus
at the foot of the Cross, the visible stamp of which was borne by one of them. On Friday, the
23d of October, Sailer remained alone with her during nearly the whole of the day; he saw blood
flow from her head, her hands, and her feet, and he was able to bestow upon her great
consolation in her interior trials. He most earnestly recommended her to tell everything without
reserve to the writer of these pages, and he came to an understanding upon the subject with her
ordinary director. He heard her confession, gave her the Holy Communion on Saturday, the 24th,
and then continued his journey to the Count de Stolberg’s. On his return, at the beginning of
November, he again passed a day with her. He remained her friend until death, prayed constantly
for her, and asked her prayers whenever he found himself in trying or difficult positions. The writer of these pages remained until January. He returned
again in May 1819, and continued to watch Anne Catherine almost uninterruptedly until her death.
The saintly maiden continually besought the Almighty to remove the exterior stigmas, on
account of the trouble and fatigue which they occasioned, and her prayer was granted at the end
of seven years. Towards the conclusion of the year 1819, the blood first flowed less frequently
from her wounds, and then ceased altogether. On the 25th of December, scabs fell from her feet
and hands, and there only remained white scars, which became red on certain days, but the pain
she suffered was undiminished in the slightest degree. The mark of the cross, and the wound on
her right side, were often to be seen as before but not at any stated times. On certain days she
always had the most painful sensations around her head, as though a crown of thorns were being
pressed upon it. On these occasions she could not lean her head against anything nor even rest
it on her hand, but had to remain for long hours, sometimes even for whole nights, sitting up in
her bed, supported by cushions, whilst her pallid face, and the irrepressible groans of pain
which escaped her, made her like an awful living representation of suffering. After she had been
in this state, blood invariably flowed more or less copiously from around her head. Sometimes
her head-dress only was soaked with it, but sometimes the blood would flow down her face and
neck. On Good Friday, April 19th, 1819, all her wounds re-opened and bled, and closed again on
the following days. A most rigorous inquiry into her state was made by some doctors and
naturalists. For that end she was placed alone in a strange house, where she remained from the
7th to the 29th of August; but this examination appears to have produced no particular effects
in any way. She was brought back to her own dwelling on the 29th of August, and from that time
until she died she was left in peace, save that she was occasionally annoyed by private disputes
and public insults. On this subject Overberg wrote her the following words: ‘What have you had to suffer personally of which you can complain? I am
addressing a soul desirous of nothing so much as to become more and more like to her divine
Spouse. Have you not been treated far more gently than was your adorable Spouse? Should it not
be a subject of rejoicing to you, according to the spirit, to have been assisted to resemble him
more closely, and thus to be more pleasing in his eyes? You had suffered much with Jesus, but
hitherto insults had been for the most part spared you. With the crown of thorns you had not
worn the purple mantle and the robe of scorn, much less had you yet heard the cry, Away with him! Crucify him! Crucify him! I cannot doubt but that these
sentiments are yours. Praise be to Jesus Christ.’
On Good Friday, the 30th of March 1820, blood flowed from her head, feet, hands, chest, and
side. It happened that when she fainted, one of the persons who were with her, knowing that the
application of relics relieved her, placed near her feet a piece of linen in which some were
wrapped, and the blood which came from her wounds reached this piece of linen after a time. In
the evening, when this same piece of linen with the relics was being, placed on her chest and
shoulders, in which she was suffering much, she suddenly exclaimed, while in a state of ecstasy:
‘It is most wonderful, but I see my Heavenly Spouse lying in the tomb in the earthly Jerusalem;
and I also see him living in the heavenly Jerusalem surrounded by adoring saints, and in the
midst of these saints I see a person who is not a saint—a nun. Blood flows from her head, her
side, her hands, and her feet, and the saints are above the bleeding parts.’
On the 9th February 1821 she fell into an ecstasy at the time of the funeral of a very holy
priest. Blood flowed from her forehead, and the cross on her breast bled also. Some one asked
her, ‘What is the matter with you?’ She smiled, and spoke like one awakening from a dream: ‘We
were by the side of the body. I have been accustomed lately to hear sacred music, and the De Profundis made a great impression upon me.’ She died upon the same
day three years later. In 1821, a few weeks before Easter, she
told us that it had been said to her during her prayer, ‘Take notice, you will suffer on the
real anniversary of the Passion, and not on the day marked this year in the Ecclesiastical
Calendar.’ On Friday, the 30th of March, at ten o’clock in the morning, she sank down senseless.
Her face and bosom were bathed in blood, and her body appeared covered with bruises like what
the blows of a whip would have inflicted. At twelve o’clock in the day, she stretched herself
out in the form of a cross, and her arms were so extended as to be perfectly dislocated. A few
minutes before two o’clock, drops of blood flowed from her feet and hands. On Good Friday, the
20th of April, she was simply in a state of quiet contemplation. This remarkable exception to
the general rule seemed to be an effect of the providence of God, for, at the hour when her
wounds usually bled, a number of curious and ill-natured individuals came to see her with the
intention of causing her fresh annoyances, by publishing what they saw; but they thus were made
unintentionally to contribute to her peace, by saying that her wounds had ceased to bleed.
On the 19th of February 1822 she was again warned that she would suffer on the last Friday of
March, and not on Good Friday.
On Friday the 15th, and again on Friday the 29th, the cross on her bosom and the wound of her
side bled. Before the 29th, she more than once felt as though a stream of fire were flowing
rapidly from her heart to her side, and down her arms and legs to the stigmas, which looked red
and inflamed. On the evening of Thursday the 28th, she fell into a state of contemplation on the
Passion, and remained in it until Friday evening. Her chest, head, and side bled; all the veins
of her hands were swollen, and there was a painful spot in the centre of them, which felt damp,
although blood did not flow from it. No blood flowed from the stigmas excepting upon the 3d of
March, the day of the finding of the Holy Cross. She had also a vision of the discovery of the
true cross by St. Helena, and imagined herself to be lying in the excavation near the cross. Much blood came in the morning from her head and side, and in the
afternoon from her hands and feet, and it seemed to her as though she were being made the test
of whether the cross was really the Cross of Jesus Christ, and that her blood was testifying to
its identity.
In the year 1823, on Holy Thursday and Good Friday, which came on the 27th and 28th of March,
she had visions of the Passion, during which blood flowed from all her wounds, causing her
intense pain. Amid these awful sufferings, although ravished in spirit, she was obliged to speak
and give answers concerning all her little household affairs, as if she had been perfectly
strong and well, and she never let fall a complaint, although nearly dying. This was the last
time that her blood gave testimony to the reality of her union with the sufferings of him who
has delivered himself up wholly and entirely for our salvation. Most of the phenomena of the
ecstatic life which are shown us in the lives and writings of Saints Bridget, Gertrude,
Mechtilde, Hildegarde, Catherine of Sienna, Catherine of Genoa, Catherine of Bologna, Colomba da
Rieti, Lidwina of Schiedam, Catherine Vanini, Teresa of Jesus, Anne of St. Bartholomew, Magdalen
of Pazzi, Mary Villana, Mary Buonomi, Marina d’Escobar, Crescentia de Kaufbeuern, and many other
nuns of contemplative orders, are also to be found in the history of the interior life of Anne
Catherine Emmerich. The same path was marked out for her by God. Did she, like these holy women,
attain the end? God alone knows. Our part is only to pray that such may have been the case, and
we are allowed to hope it. Those among our readers who are not acquainted with the ecstatic life
from the writings of those who have lived it, will find information on this subject in the
Introduction of Goërres to the writings of Henry Suso, published at Ratisbonne in 1829.
Since many pious Christians, in order to render their life one perpetual act of adoration,
endeavour to see in their daily employments a symbolical representation of some manner of
honouring God, and offer it to him in union with the merits of
Christ, it cannot appear extra. ordinary that those holy souls who pass from an active life to
one of suffering and contemplation, should sometimes see their spiritual labours under the form
of those earthly occupations which formerly filled their days. Then their acts were prayers; now
their prayers are acts; but the form remains the same. It was thus that Anne Catherine, in her
ecstatic life, beheld the series of her prayers for the Church under the forms of parables
bearing reference to agriculture, gardening, weaving, sowing, or the care of sheep. All these
different occupations were arranged, according to their signification, in the different periods
of the common as well as the ecclesiastical year, and were pursued under the patronage and with
the assistance of the saints of each day, the special graces of the corresponding feasts of the
Church being also applied to them. The signification of this circle of symbols had reference to
all the active part of her interior life. One example will help to explain our meaning. When
Anne Catherine, while yet a child, was employed in weeding, she besought God to root up the
cockle from the field of the Church. If her hands were stung by the nettles, or if she was
obliged to do afresh the work of idlers, she offered to God her pain and her fatigue, and
besought him, in the name of Jesus Christ, that the pastor of souls might not become weary, and
that none of them might cease to labour zealously and diligently. Thus her manual labour became
a prayer.
I will now give a corresponding example of her life of contemplation and ecstasy. She had been
ill several times, and in a state of almost continual ecstasy, during which she often moaned,
and moved her hands like a person employed in weeding. She complained one morning that her hands
and arms smarted and itched, and on examination they were found to be covered with blisters,
like what would have been produced by the stinging of nettles. She then begged several persons
of her acquaintance to join their prayers to hers for a certain intention. The next day her
hands were inflamed and painful, as they would have been after hard
work; and when asked the cause, she replied: ‘Ah! I have had so many nettles to root up in the
vineyard, because those whose duty it was to do it only pulled off the stems, and I was obliged
to draw the roots with much difficulty out of a stony soil.’ The person who had asked her the
question began to blame these careless workmen, but he felt much confused when she replied: ‘You
were one of them,—those who only pull off the stems of the nettles, and leave the roots in the
earth, are persons who pray carelessly.’ It was afterwards discovered that she had been praying
for several dioceses which were shown to her under the figure of vineyards laid waste, and in
which labour was needed. The real inflammation of her hands bore testimony to this symbolical
rooting up of the nettles; and we have, perhaps, reason to hope that the churches shown to her
under the appearances of vineyards experienced the good effects of her prayer and spiritual
labour; for since the door is opened to those who knock, it must certainly be opened above all
to those who knock with such energy as to cause their fingers to be wounded.
Similar reactions of the spirit upon the body are often found in the lives of persons subject
to ecstasies, and are by no means contrary to faith. St. Paula, if we may believe St. Jerome,
visited the holy places in spirit just as if she had visited them bodily; and a like thing
happened to St. Colomba of Rieti and St. Lidwina of Schiedam. The body of the latter bore traces
of this spiritual journey, as if she had really travelled; she experienced all the fatigue that
a painful journey would cause: her feet were wounded and covered with marks which looked as if
they had been made by stones or thorns, and finally she had a sprain from which she long
suffered.
She was led on this journey by her guardian angel, who told her that these corporeal wounds
signified that she had been ravished in body and spirit.
Similar hurts were also to be seen upon the body of Anne Catherine immediately after some of
her visions. Lidwina began her ecstatic journey by following her good angel to the chapel of the Blessed Virgin before Schiedam; Anne Catherine began hers by
following her angel guardian either to the chapel which was near her dwelling, or else to the
Way of the Cross of Coesfeld.
Her journeys to the Holy Land were made, according to the accounts she gave of them, by the
most opposite roads; sometimes even she went all round the earth, when the task spiritually
imposed upon her required it. In the course of these journeys from her home to the most distant
countries., she carried assistance to many persons, exercising in their regard works of mercy,
both corporal and spiritual, and this was done frequently in parables. At the end of a year she
would go over the same ground again, see the same persons, and give an account of their
spiritual progress or of their relapse into sin. Every part of this labour always bore some
reference to the Church, and to the king dom. of God upon earth.
The end of these daily pilgrimages which she made in spirit was invariably the Promised Land,
every part of which she examined in detail, and which she saw sometimes in its present state,
and sometimes as it was at, different periods of sacred history; for her distinguishing
characteristic and special privilege was an intuitive knowledge of the history of the Old and
New Testaments, and of that of the members of the Holy Family, and of all the saints whom she
was contemplating in spirit. She saw the signification of all the festival days of the
ecclesiastical year under both a devotional and an historical point of view. She saw and
described, day by day, with the minutest detail, and by name, places, persons, festivals,
customs, and miracles, all that happened during the public life of Jesus until the Ascension,
and the history of the apostles for several weeks after the Descent of the Holy Ghost. She
regarded all her visions not as mere spiritual enjoyments, but as being, so to speak, fertile
fields, plentifully strewn with the merits of Christ, and which had not as yet been cultivated;
she was often engaged in spirit in praying that the fruit of such and such Sufferings of our
Lord might be given to the Church, and she would beseech God to apply to his Church the merits of our Saviour which were its inheritance, and of which she
would, as it were, take possession, in its name, with the most touching simplicity and
ingenuousness.
She never considered her visions to have any reference to her exterior Christian life, nor did
she regard them as being of any historical value. Exteriorly she knew and believed nothing but
the catechism, the common history of the Bible, the gospels for Sundays and festivals, and the
Christian almanac, which to her far-sighted vision was an inexhaustible mine of hidden riches,
since it gave her in a few pages a guiding thread which led her through all time, and by means
of which she passed from mystery to mystery, and solemnised each with all the saints, in order
to reap the fruits of eternity in time, and to preserve and distribute them in her pilgrimage
around the ecclesiastical year, that so the will of God might be accomplished on earth as it is
in Heaven. She had never read the Old or the New Testaments, and when she was tired of relating
her visions, she would sometimes say: ‘Read that in the Bible,’ and then be astonished to learn
that it was not there; ‘for,’ she would add, ‘people are constantly saying in these days that
you need read nothing but the Bible, which contains everything, &c. &c.’
The real task of her life was to suffer for the Church and for some of its members, whose
distress was shown her in spirit, or who asked her prayers without knowing that this poor sick
nun had something more to do for them than to say the
Pater noster
, but that all their spiritual and corporal sufferings became her own, and that she had to
endure patiently the most terrible pains, without being assisted, like the contemplatives of
former days, by the sympathising prayers of an entire community. In the age when she lived, she
had no other assistance than that of medicine. While thus enduring sufferings which she had
taken upon herself for others, she often turned her thoughts to the corresponding sufferings of
the Church, and when thus suffering, for one single person, she would likewise offer all she
endured for the whole Church.
The following is a remarkable instance of the sort:—During several weeks she had every symptom
of consumption; violent irritation of the lungs, excessive perspiration, which soaked her whole
bed, a racking cough, continual expectoration, and a strong continual fever. So fearful were her
sufferings that her death was hourly expected and even desired. It was remarked that she had to
struggle strangely against a strong temptation to irritability. Did she yield for an instant,
she burst into tears, her sufferings increased tenfold, and she seemed unable to exist unless
she immediately gained pardon in the sacrament of penance. She had also to combat a feeling of
aversion to a certain person whom she had not seen for years. She was in despair because this
person, with whom nevertheless she declared she had nothing in common, was always before her
eyes in the most evil dispositions, and she wept bitterly, and with much anxiety of conscience,
saying that she would not commit sin, that her grief must be evident to all, and other things
which were quite unintelligible to the persons listening to her. Her illness continued to
increase, and she was thought to be on the point of death. At this moment one of her friends saw
her, to his great surprise, suddenly raise herself up on her bed, and say:—
‘Repeat with me the prayers for those in their last agony.’ He did as requested, and she
answered the Litany in a firm voice. After some little time, the bell for the agonising was
heard, and a person came in to ask Anne Catherine’s prayers for his sister, who was just dead.
Anne Catherine asked for details concerning her illness and death, as if deeply interested in
the subject, and the friend above-mentioned heard the account given by the new comer of a
consumption resembling in the minutest particulars the illness of Anne Catherine herself. The
deceased woman had at first been in so much pain and so disturbed in mind that she had seemed
quite unable to prepare herself for death; but during the last fortnight she had been better,
had made her peace with God, having in the first place been reconciled to a person with whom
she was at enmity, and had died in peace, fortified by the last
sacraments, and attended by her former enemy. Anne Catherine gave a small sum of money for the
burial and funeral-service of this person. Her sweatings, cough, and fever now left her, and she
resembled a person exhausted with fatigue, whose linen has been changed, and who has been placed
on a fresh bed. Her friend said to her, ‘When this fearful illness came upon you, this woman
grew better, and her hatred for another was the only obstacle to her making peace with God. You
took upon yourself, for the time, her feelings of hatred, she died in good dispositions, and now
you seem tolerably well again. Are you still suffering on her account?’ ‘No, indeed!’ she
replied; ‘that would be most unreasonable; but how can any person avoid suffering when even the
end of his little finger is in pain? We are all one body in Christ.’ ‘By the goodness of God,’
said her friend, ‘you are now once more somewhat at ease.’ ‘Not for very long, though,’ she
replied with a smile; ‘there are other persons who want my assistance.’ Then she turned round on
her bed, and rested awhile.
A very few days later, she began to feel intense pain in all her limbs, and symptoms of water
on the chest manifested themselves. We discovered the sick person for whom Anne Catherine was
suffering, and we saw that his sufferings suddenly diminished or immensely increased in exact
inverse proportion to those of Anne Catherine.
Thus did charity compel her to take upon herself the illnesses and even the temptations of
others, that they might be able in peace to prepare themselves for death. She was compelled to
suffer in silence, both to conceal the weaknesses of her neighbour, and not to be regarded as
mad herself; she war, obliged to receive all the aid that medicine could afford her for an
illness thus taken voluntarily for the relief of others, and to be reproached for temptations
which were not her own; finally, it was necessary that she should appear perverted in the eyes
of men, that so those for whom she was suffering might be converted before God.
One day a friend in deep affliction was sitting by her bedside, when she suddenly fell into a
state of ecstasy, and began to pray aloud: ‘O, my sweet Jesus, permit me to carry that heavy
stone!’ Her friend asked her what was the matter. ‘I am on my way to Jerusalem,’ she replied,
‘and I see a poor man walking along with the greatest difficulty, for there is a large stone
upon his breast, the weight of which nearly crushes him.’ Then again, after a few moments, she
exclaimed: ‘Give me that heavy stone, you cannot carry it any farther; give it to me.’ All on a
sudden she sank down fainting, as if crushed beneath some heavy burden, and at the same moment
her friend felt himself relieved from the weight of sorrow which oppressed him, and his heart
overflowing with extraordinary happiness. Seeing her in such a state of suffering, he asked her
what the matter was, and she looking at him with a smile, replied: ‘I cannot remain here any
longer. Poor man, you must take back your burden.’ Instantly her friend felt all the weight of
his affliction return to him, whilst she, becoming as well again as before, continued her
journey in spirit to Jerusalem.
We will give one more example of her spiritual exertions. One morning she gave her friend a
little bag containing some rye-flour and eggs, and pointed out to him a small house where a poor
woman, who was in a consumption, was living with her husband and two little children. He was to
tell her to boil and take them, as when boiled they would be good for her chest. The friend, on
entering the cottage, took the bag from under his cloak, when the poor mother, who, flushed with
fever, was lying on a mattress between her half-naked children, fixed her bright eyes upon him,
and holding out her thin hands, exclaimed: ‘O, sir, it must be God or Sister Emmerich who sends
you to me! You are bringing me some rye-flour and eggs.’ Here the poor woman, overcome by her
feelings, burst into tears, and then began to cough so violently that she had to make a sign to
her husband to speak for her. He said that the previous night Gertrude had been much disturbed,
and had talked a great deal in her sleep, and that on awaking she
had told him her dream in these words: ‘I thought that I was standing at the door with you, when
the holy nun came out of the door of the next house, and I told you to look at her. She stopped
in front of us, and said to me: “Ah, Gertrude, you look very ill; I will send you some rye-flour
and eggs, which will relieve your chest.” Then I awoke.’ Such was the simple tale of the poor
man; he and his wife both eagerly expressed their gratitude, and the bearer of Anne Catherine’s
alms left the house much overcome. He did not tell her anything of this when he saw her, but a
few days after, she sent him again to the same place with a similar present, and he then asked
her how it was she knew that poor woman? ‘You know,’ she replied, ‘that I pray every evening for
all those who suffer; I should like to go and relieve them, and I generally dream that I am
going from one abode of suffering to another, and that I assist them to the best of my power. In
this way I went in my dream to that poor woman’s house; she was standing at the door with her
husband, and I said to her: “Ah, Gertrude, you look very ill; I will send you some rye-flour and
eggs, which will relieve your chest.” And this I did through you, the next morning.’ Both
persons had remained in their beds, and dreamed the same thing, and the dream came true. St.
Augustin, in his City of God, book xviii., c. 18, relates a similar thing
of two philosophers, who visited each other in a dream, and explained some passages of Plato,
both remaining asleep in their own houses.
These sufferings, and this peculiar species of active labour, were like a single ray of light,
which enlightened her whole life. Infinite was the number of spiritual labours and sympathetic
sufferings which came from all parts and entered into her heart—that heart so burning with love
of Jesus Christ. Like St. Catherine of Sienna and some other ecstatics, she often felt the most
profound feeling of conviction that our Saviour had taken her heart out of her bosom, and placed
his own there instead for a time.
The following fragment will give some idea of the mysterious symbolism by which she was
interiorly directed. During a portion of the year 1820 she performed many labours in spirit, for
several different parishes; her prayers being represented under the figure of most severe labour
in a vineyard. What we have above related concerning the nettles is of the same character.
On the 6th of September her heavenly guide said to her: ‘“ You weeded, dug around, tied, and
pruned the vine; you ground down the weeds so that they could never spring up any more; and then
you went away joyfully and rested from your prayers. Prepare now to labour hard from the feast
of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin to that of St. Michael; the grapes are ripening and must
be well watched.” Then he led me,’ she continued, ‘to the vineyard of St. Liboire, and showed me
the vines at which I had worked. My labour had been successful, for the grapes were getting
their colour and growing large, and in some parts the red juice was running down on the ground
from them. My guide said to me: “When the virtues of the good begin to shine forth in public,
they have to combat bravely, to be oppressed, to be tempted, and to suffer persecution. A hedge
must be planted around the vineyard in order that the ripe grapes may not be destroyed by
thieves and wild beasts, i.e. by temptation and persecution.” He then
showed me how to build a wall by heaping up stones, and to raise a thick hedge of thorns all
around. As my hands bled from such severe labour, God, in order to give me strength, permitted
me to see the mysterious signification of the vine, and of several other fruit trees. Jesus
Christ is the true Vine, who is to take root and grow in us; all useless wood must be cut away,
in order not to waste the sap, which is to become the wine, and in the Most Blessed Sacrament
the Blood of Christ. The pruning of the vine has to be done according to certain rules which
were made known to me. This pruning is, in a spiritual sense, the cutting off whatever is
useless, penance and mortification, that so the true Vine may grow in us, and bring forth
fruit. in the place of corrupt nature, which only bean wood and
leaves. The pruning is done according to fixed rules, for it is only required that certain
useless shoots should be cut off in man, and to lop off more would be to mutilate in a guilty
manner. No pruning should ever be done upon the stock which has been planted in humankind
through the Blessed Virgin, and is to remain in it for ever. The true Vine unites heaven to
earth, the Divinity to humanity; and it is the human part that is to be pruned, that so the
divine alone may grow. I saw so many other things relating to the vine that a book as large as
the Bible could not contain them. One day, when I was suffering acute pain in my chest, I
besought our Lord with groans not to give me a burthen above my strength to bear; and then my
Heavenly Spouse appeared, and said to me, . . . “I have laid thee on my nuptial couch, which is
a couch of suffering; I have given thee suffering and expiation for thy bridal garments and
jewels. Thou must suffer, but I will not forsake thee; thou art fastened to the Vine, and thou
wilt not be lost.” Then I was consoled for all my sufferings. It was likewise explained to me
why in ray visions relating to the feasts of the family of Jesus, such, for instance, as those
of St. Anne, St. Joachim, St. Joseph, &c., I always saw the Church of the festival under
the figure of a shoot of the vine. The same was the case on the festivals of St. Francis of
Assissium, St. Catherine of Sienna, and of all the saints who have had the stigmas.
‘The signification of my sufferings in all my limbs was explained to me in the following
vision: I saw a gigantic human body in a horrible state of mutilation, and raised upwards
towards the sky. There were no fingers or toes on the hands and feet, the body was covered with
frightful wounds, some of which were fresh and bleeding, others covered with dead flesh or
turned into excrescences. The whole of one aide was black, gangrened, and as it were half eaten
away. I suffered as though it had been my own body that was in this state, and then my guide
said to me, “This is the body of the Church, the body of all men
and thine also.” Then, pointing to each wound, he showed me at the same time some part of the
world; I saw an infinite number of men and nations separated from the Church, all in their own
peculiar way, and I felt pain as exquisite from this separation as if they had been torn from my
body. Then my guide said to me: “Let thy sufferings teach thee a lesson, and offer them to God
in union with those of Jesus for all who are separated. Should not one member call upon another,
and suffer in order to cure and unite it once more to the body? When those parts which are most
closely united to the body detach themselves, it is as though the flesh were torn from around
the heart. In my ignorance, I thought that he was speaking of those brethren who are not in
communion with us, but my guide added: “Who are our brethren? It is not our blood relations who
are the nearest to our hearts, but those who are our brethren in the blood of Christ—the
children of the Church who fall away.” He showed me that the black and gangrened side of the
body would soon be cured; that the putrified flesh which had collected around the wounds
represented heretics who divide one from the other in proportion as they increase; that the dead
flesh was the figure of all. who are spiritually dead, and who are void of any feeling; and that
the ossified parts represented obstinate and hardened heretics. I saw and felt in this manner
every wound and its signification. The body reached up to heaven. It was the body of the Bride
of Christ, and most painful to behold. I wept bitterly, but feeling at once deeply grieved and
strengthened by sorrow and compassion, I began again to labour with all my strength.’
Sinking beneath the weight of life and of the task imposed upon her she often besought God to
deliver her, and she then would appear to be on the very brink of the grave. But each time she
would say: ‘Lord, not my will but thine be done! If my prayers and sufferings are useful let me
live a thousand years, but grant that I may die rather than ever offend thee.’ Then she would
receive orders to live, and arise, taking up her cross, once more to bear it in patience and suffering after her Lord. >From time to time the road of
life which she was pursuing used to be shown to her, leading to the top of a mountain on which
was a shining and resplendent city—the heavenly Jerusalem. Often she would think she had arrived
at that blissful abode, which seemed to be quite near her, and her joy would be great. But all
on a sudden she would discover that she was still separated from it by a valley, and then she
would have to descend precipices. and follow indirect paths, labouring, suffering, and
performing deeds of charity everywhere. She had to direct wanderers into the right road, raise
up the fallen, sometimes even carry the paralytic, and drag the unwilling by force, and all
these deeds of charity were as so many fresh weights fastened to her cross. Then she walked with
more difficulty, bending beneath her burden and sometimes even falling to the ground.
In 1823 she repeated more frequently than usual that she could not perform her task in her
present situation, that she had not strength for it, and that it was in a peaceful convent that
she needed to have lived and died. She added that God would soon take her to himself, and that
she had besought him to permit her to obtain by her prayers in the next world what her weakness
would not permit her to accomplish in this. St. Catherine of Sienna, a short time before death,
made a similar prayer.
Anne Catherine had previously had a vision concerning what her prayers might obtain after
death, with regard to things that were not in existence during her life. The year 1823, the last
of which she completed the whole circle, brought her immense labours. She appeared desirous to
accomplish her entire task, and thus kept the promise which she had previously made of relating
the history of the whole Passion. It formed the subject of her Lenten meditations during this
year, and of them the present volume is composed. But she did not on this account take less part
in the fundamental mystery of this penitential season, or in the different mysteries of each of
the festival days of the Church, if indeed the words to
take part be sufficient to express the
wonderful manner in which she rendered visible testimony to the mystery celebrated in each
festival by a sudden change in her corporal and spiritual life. See on this subject the chapter
entitled Interruption of the Pictures of the Passion.
Every one of the ceremonies and festivals of the Church was to her far more than the
consecration of a remembrance. She beheld in the historical foundation of each solemnity an act
of the Almighty, done in time for the reparation of fallen humanity. Although these divine acts
appeared to her stamped with the character of eternity, yet she was well aware that in order for
man to profit by them in the bounded and narrow sphere of time, he must, as it were, take
possession of them in a series of successive moments, and that for this purpose they had to be
repeated and renewed in the Church, in the order established by Jesus Christ and the Holy
Spirit. All festivals and solemnities were in her eyes eternal graces which returned at fixed
epochs in every ecclesiastical year, in the same manner as the fruits and harvests of the earth
come in their seasons in the natural year.
Her zeal and gratitude in receiving and treasuring up these graces were untiring, nor was she
less eager and zealous in offering them to those who neglected their value. In the same manner
as her compassion for her crucified Saviour had pleased God and obtained for her the privilege
of being marked with the stigmas of the Passion as with a seal of the most perfect love, so all
the sufferings of the Church and of those who were in affliction were repeated in the different
states of her body and soul. And all these wonders took place within her, unknown to those who
were around her; nor was she herself even more fully conscious of them than is the bee of the
effects of its work, while yet she was tending and cultivating, with all the care of an
industrious and faithful gardener, the fertile garden of the ecclesiastical year. She lived on
its fruits, and distributed them to others; she strengthened herself and her friends with the
flowers and herbs which she cultivated; or, rather, she herself was in this garden like a
sensitive plant, a sunflower, or some wonderful plant in which,
independent of her own will, were reproduced all the seasons of the year, all the hours of the
day, and all the changes of the atmosphere.
At the end of the ecclesiastical year of 1823, she had for the last time a vision on the
subject of making up the accounts of that year. The negligences of the Church militant and of
her servants were shown to Anne Catherine, under various symbols; she saw how many graces had
not been coöperated with, or been rejected to a greater or less extent, and how many had been
entirely thrown away. It was made known to her how our Blessed Redeemer had deposited for each
year in the garden of the Church a complete treasure of his merits, sufficient for every
requirement, and for the expiation of every sin. The strictest account was to be given of all
graces which had been neglected, wasted, or wholly rejected, and the Church-militant was
punished for this negligence or infidelity of her servants by being oppressed by her enemies, or
by temporal humiliations. Revelations of this description raised to excess her love for the
Church, her mother. She passed days and nights in praying for her, in offering to God the merits
of Christ, with continual groans, and in imploring mercy. Finally, on these occasions, she
gathered together all her courage, and offered to take upon herself both the fault and the
punishment, like a child presenting itself before the king’s throne, in order to suffer the
punishment she had incurred. It was then said to her, ‘See how wretched and miserable thou art
thyself; thou who art desirous to satisfy for the sins of others.’ And to her great terror she
beheld herself as one mournful mass of infinite imperfection. But still her love remained
undaunted, and burst forth in these words, ‘Yes, I am full of misery and sin; but I am thy
spouse, O my Lord, and my Saviour! My faith in thee and in the redemption which thou hast
brought us covers all my sins as with thy royal mantle. I will not leave thee until thou hast
accepted my sacrifice, for the superabundant treasure of thy merits is closed to none of thy
faithful servants.’ At length her prayer became wonderfully
energetic, and to human ears there was like a dispute and combat with God, in which she was
carried away and urged on by the violence of love. If her sacrifice was accepted, her energy
seemed to abandon her, and she was left to the repugnance of human nature for suffering. When
she had gone through this trial, by keeping her eyes fixed on her Redeemer in the Garden of
Olives, she next had to endure indescribable sufferings of every description, bearing them all
with wonderful patience and sweetness. We used to see her remain several days together,
motionless and insensible, looking like a dying lamb. Did we ask her how she was, she would half
open her eyes, and reply with a sweet smile, ‘My sufferings are most salutary.’
At the beginning of Advent, her sufferings were a little soothed by sweet visions of the
preparations made by the Blessed Virgil, to leave her home, and then of her whole journey with
St. Joseph to Bethlehem. She accompanied them each day to the humble inns where they rested for
the night, or went on before them to prepare their lodgings. During this time she used to take
old pieces of linen, and at night, while sleeping, make them into baby clothes and caps for the
children of poor women, the times of whose confinements were near at hand. The next day she
would be surprised to see all these things neatly arranged in her drawers. This happened to her
every year about the same time, but this year she had more fatigue and less consolation. Thus,
at the hour of our Saviour’s birth, when she was usually perfectly overwhelmed with joy, she
could only crawl with the greatest difficulty to the crib where the Child Jesus was lying, and
bring him no present but myrrh, no offering but her cross, beneath the weight of which she sank
down half dying at his feet. It seemed as though she were for the last time making up her
earthly accounts with God, and for the last time also offering herself in the place of a
countless number of men who were spiritually and corporally afflicted. Even the little that is
known of the manner in which she took upon herself the sufferings
of others is almost incomprehensible. She very truly said: ‘This year the Child Jesus has only
brought me a cross and instruments of suffering.’
She became each day more and more absorbed in her sufferings, and although she continued to
see Jesus travelling from city to city during his public life, the utmost she ever said on the
subject was, briefly to name in which direction he was going. Once, she asked suddenly in a
scarcely audible voice, ‘What day is it?’ When told that it was the 14th of January, she added:
‘Had I but a few days more, I should have related the entire life of our Saviour, but now it. is
no longer possible for me to do so.’ These words were the more incomprehensible as she did not
appear to know even which year of the public life of Jesus she was then contemplating in spirit.
In 1820 she had related the history of our Saviour down to the Ascension, beginning at the 28th
of July of the third year of the public life of Jesus, after which she returned to the first
year of the life of Jesus, and had continued down to the 10th of January of the third year of
his public life. On the 27th of April 1823, in consequence of a journey made by the writer, an
interruption of her narrative took place, and lasted down to the 21st of October. She then took
up the thread of her narrative where she had left it, and continued it to the last weeks of her
life. When she spoke of a few days being wanted, her friend himself did not know how far her
narrative went, not having had leisure to arrange what he had written. After her death he became
convinced that if she had been able to speak during the last fourteen days of her life, ’she
would have brought it down to the 28th of July of the third year of the public life of our Lord,
consequently to where she had taken it up in 1820.
Her condition daily became more frightful. She, who usually suffered in silence, uttered
stifled groans, so awful was the anguish she endured. On the 15th of January she said: ‘The
Child Jesus brought me great sufferings at Christmas. I was once more by his manger at
Bethlehem. He was burning with fever, and showed me his sufferings and those of his mother. They were so poor that they had no food but a wretched piece of
bread. He bestowed still greater sufferings upon me, and said to me: “Thou art mine; thou art my
spouse; suffer as I suffered, without asking the reason why.” I do not know what my sufferings
are to be, nor how long they will last. I submit blindly to my martyrdom, whether for life or
for death: I only desire that the hidden designs of God may be accomplished in me. On the other
hand, I am calm, and I have consolations in my sufferings. Even this morning I was very happy.
Blessed be the holy Name of God!’
Her sufferings continued, if possible, to increase. Sitting up, and with her eyes closed, she
fell from one side to another, while smothered groans escaped her lips. If she laid down, she
was in danger of being stifled; her breathing was hurried and oppressed, and all her nerves and
muscles were shaken and trembled with anguish. After violent retching, she suffered terrible
pain in her bowels, so much so that it was feared gangrene must be forming there. Her throat was
parched and burning, her mouth swollen, her cheeks crimson with fever, her hands white as ivory.
The scars of the stigmas shone like silver beneath her distended skin. Her pulse gave from 160
to 180 pulsations per minute. Although unable to speak from her excessive suffering, she bore
every duty perfectly in mind. On the evening of the 26th, she said to her friend, ‘To-day is the
ninth day, you must pay for the wax taper and novena at the chapel of St. Anne.’ She was
alluding to a novena which she had asked to have made for her intention, and she was afraid lest
her friends should forget it. On the 27th, at two o’clock in the afternoon, she received Extreme
Unction, greatly to the relief both of her soul and body. In the evening her friend, the
excellent curé of H———, prayed at her bedside, which was an immense comfort to her. She said to
him: ‘How good and beautiful all this is!’ And again: ‘May God be a thousand times praised and
thanked!’
The approach of death did not wholly interrupt the wonderful union of her life with that of
the Church. A friend having visited her on the 1st of February in
the evening, had placed himself behind her bed where she could not see him, and was listening
with the utmost compassion to her low moans and interrupted breathing, when suddenly all became
silent, and he thought that she was dead. At this moment the evening bell ringing for the matins
of the Purification was heard. It was the opening of this festival which had caused her soul to
be ravished in ecstasy. Although still in a very alarming state, she let some sweet and loving
words concerning the Blessed Virgin escape her lips during the night and day of the festival.
Towards twelve o’clock in the day, she said in a voice already changed by the near approach of
death, ‘It was long since I had felt so well. I have been ill quite a week, have I not? I feel
as though I knew nothing about this world of darkness! O, what light the Blessed Mother of God
showed me! She took me with her, and how willingly would I have remained with her!’ Here she
recollected herself for a moment, and then Said, placing her finger on her lip: ‘But I must not
speak of these things.’ From that time she said that the slightest word in her praise greatly
increased her sufferings.
The following days she was worse. On the 7th, in the evening, being rather more calm, she
said: ‘Ah, my sweet Lord Jesus, thanks be to thee again and again for every part of my life.
Lord, thy will and not mine be done.’ On the 8th of February, in the evening, a priest was
praying near her bed, when she gratefully kissed his hand, begged him to assist at her death,
and said, ‘O Jesus, I live for thee, I die for thee. O Lord, praise be to thy holy name, I no
longer see or hear!’ Her friends wished to change her position, and thus ease her pain a little;
but she said, ‘I am on the Cross, it will soon all be over, leave me in peace.’ She had received
all the last Sacraments, but she wished to accuse herself once more in confession of a slight
fault which she had already many times confessed; it was probably of the same nature as a sin
which she had committed in her childhood, of which she often accused herself, and which
consisted in having gone through a hedge into a neighbour’s garden,
and coveted some apples which had fallen on the ground. She had only looked at them; for, thank
God, she said, she did not touch them, but she thought that was a sin against the tenth
commandment. The priest gave her a general absolution; after which she stretched herself out,
and those around her thought that she was dying. A person who had often given her pain now drew
near her bed and asked her pardon. She looked at him in surprise, and said with the most
expressive accent of truth, ‘I have nothing to forgive any living creature.’
During the last days of her life, when her death was momentarily expected, several of her
friends remained constantly in the room adjoining hers. They were speaking in a low tone, and so
that she could not hear them, of her patience, faith, and other virtues, when all on a sudden
they heard her dying voice saying: ‘Ah, for the love of God, do not praise me—that keeps me
here, because I then have to suffer double. O my God! how many fresh flowers are falling upon
me!’ She always saw flowers as the forerunners and figures of sufferings. Then she rejected all
praises, with the most profound conviction of her own unworthiness, saying: ‘God alone is good:
everything must be paid, down to the last farthing. I am poor and loaded with sin, and I can
only make up for having been praised by sufferings united to those of Jesus Christ. Do not
praise me, but let me die in ignominy with Jesus on the cross.’
Boudon, in his life of Father Surin, relates a similar trait of a dying man, who had been
thought to have lost the sense of hearing, but who energetically rejected a word of praise
pronounced by those who were surrounding his bed.
A few hours before death, for which she was longing, saying, ‘O Lord assist me; come, O Lord
Jesus? a word of praise appeared to detain her, and she most energetically rejected it by making
the following act of humility: ‘I cannot die if so many good persons think well of me through a
mistake; I beg of you to tell them all that I am a wretched sinner!
Would that I could proclaim so as to be heard by all men, how great a sinner I am! I am far
beneath the good thief who was crucified by the side of Jesus, for he and all his contemporaries
had not so terrible an account as we shall have to render of all the graces which have been
bestowed upon the Church.’ After this declaration, she appeared to grow calm, and she said to
the priest who was comforting her: ‘I feel now as peaceful and as much filled with hope and
confidence as if I had never committed a sin.’ Her eyes turned lovingly towards the cross which
was placed at the foot of her bed, her breathing became accelerated, she often drank some
liquid; and when the little crucifix was held to her, she from humility only kissed the feet. A
friend who was kneeling by her bedside in tears, had the comfort of often holding her the water
with which to moisten her lips. As she had laid her hand, on which the white sear of the wound
was most distinctly visible, on the counterpane, he took hold of that hand, which was already
cold, and as he inwardly wished for some mark of farewell from her, she slightly pressed his.
Her face was calm and serene, bearing an expression of heavenly gravity, and which can only be
compared to that of a valiant wrestler who after making unheard-of efforts to gain the victory,
sinks back and dies in the very act of seizing the prize. The priest again read through the
prayers for persons in their last agony, and she then felt an inward inspiration to pray for a
pious young friend whose feast day it was. Eight o’clock struck; she breathed more freely for
the space of a few minutes, and then cried three times with a deep groan: ‘O Lord, assist me
Lord, Lord, come!’ The priest rang his bell, and said, ‘She is dying.’ Several relations and
friends who were in the next room came in and knelt down to pray. She was then holding in her
hand a lighted taper, which the priest was supporting. She breathed forth several slight sighs,
and then her pure soul escaped her chaste lips, and hastened, clothed in the nuptial garment, to
appear in heavenly hope before the Divine Bridegroom, and be united for ever to that blessed
company of virgins who follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. Her
lifeless body sank gently back on the pillows at half-past eight o’clock, P.M., on the 9th
February 1824.
A person who had taken great interest in her during life wrote as follows: ‘After her death, I
drew near to her bed. She was supported by pillows, and lying on her left side. Some crutches,
which had been prepared for her by her friends on one occasion when she had been able to take a
few turns in the room, were hanging over her head, crossed, in a corner. Near them hung a little
oil painting representing the death of the Blessed Virgin, which had been given her by the
Princess of Salm. The expression of her countenance was perfectly sublime, and bore the traces
of the spirit of self-sacrifice, the patience and resignation of her whole life; she looked as
though she had died for the love of Jesus, in the very act of performing some work of charity
for others. Her right hand was resting on the counterpane—that hand on which God had bestowed
the unparalleled favour of being able at once to recognise by the touch anything that was holy,
or that had been consecrated by the Church—a favour which perhaps no one had ever before enjoyed
to so great an extent—a favour by which the interests of religion might be inconceivably
promoted, provided it was made use of with discretion, and which surely had not been bestowed
upon a poor ignorant peasant girl merely for her own personal gratification. For the last time I
took in mine the band marked with a sign so worthy of our utmost veneration, the hand which was
as a spiritual instrument in the instant recognition of whatever was holy, that it might be
honoured even in a grain of sand—the charitable industrious hand, which had so often fed the
hungry and clothed the naked—this hand was now cold and lifeless. A great favour had been
withdrawn from earth, God had taken from us the hand of his spouse, who had rendered testimony
to, prayed, and suffered for the truth. It appeared as though it had not been without meaning,
that she had resignedly laid down upon her bed the hand which was the outward expression of a
particular privilege granted by Divine grace. Fearful of having the
strong impression made upon me by the sight of her countenance diminished by the necessary but
disturbing preparations which were being made around her bed, I thoughtfully left her room. If,
I said to myself—if, like so many holy solitaries, she had died alone in a grave prepared by her
own hands, her friends—the birds—would have covered her with flowers and leaves; if, like other
religious, she had died among virgins consecrated to God, and that their tender care and
respectful veneration had followed her to the grave, as was the case, for example, with St.
Columba of Rieti, it would have been edifying and pleasing to those who loved her; but doubtless
such honours rendered to her lifeless remains would not have been conformable to her love for
Jesus, whom she so much desired to resemble in death as in life.’
The same friend later wrote as follows: ‘Unfortunately there was no official post-mortem
examination of her body, and none of those inquiries by which she had been so tormented during
life were instituted after her death. The friends who surrounded her neglected to examine her
body, probably for fear of coming upon some striking phenomenon, the discovery of which might
have caused much annoyance in various ways. On Wednesday the 11th of February her body was
prepared for burial. A pious female, who would not give up to any one the task of rendering her
this last mark of affection, described to me as follows the condition in which she found her: “
Her feet were crossed like the feet of a crucifix. The places of the stigmas were more red than
usual. When we raised her head blood flowed from her nose and mouth. All her limbs remained
flexible and with none of the stiffness of death even till the coffin was closed.” On Friday the
13th of February she was taken to the grave, followed by the entire population of the place. She
reposes in the cemetery, to the left of the cross, on the side nearest the hedge. In the grave
in front of hers there rests a good old peasant of Welde, and in the grave behind a poor but
virtuous female from Dernekamp.
‘On the evening of the day when she was buried, a rich man went,
not to Pilate, but to the curé of the place. He asked for the body of Anne Catherine, not to
place it in a new sepulchre, but to buy it at a high price for a Dutch doctor. The proposal was
rejected as it deserved, but it appears that the report spread in the little town that the body
had been taken away, and it is said that the people went in great numbers to the cemetery to
ascertain whether the grave had been robbed.’
To these details we will add the following extract from an account printed in December 1824,
in the Journal of Catholic Literature of Kerz. This account was written
by a person with whom we are unacquainted, but who appears to have been well informed: ‘About
six or seven weeks after the death of Anne Catherine Emmerich, a report having got about that
her body had been stolen away, the grave and coffin were opened in secret, by order of the
authorities, in the presence of seven witnesses. They found with surprise not unmixed with joy
that corruption had not yet begun its work on the body of the pious maiden. Her features and
countenance were smiling like those of a person who is dreaming sweetly. She looked as though
she had but just been placed in the coffin, nor did her body exhale any corpse-like smell. It is good to keep the secret of the king, says Jesus the son of Sirach; but
it is also good to reveal to the world the greatness of the mercy of God.’
We have been told that a stone has been placed over her grave. We lay upon it these pages; may
they contribute to immortalise the memory of a person who has relieved so many pains of soul and
body, and that of the spot where her mortal remains lie awaiting the Day of Resurrection.
|